<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>With-Qwen3-8-Flash on Jaehun's Blog</title><link>https://jaehun.me/en/categories/with-qwen3-8-flash/</link><description>Recent content in With-Qwen3-8-Flash on Jaehun's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jaehun.me/en/categories/with-qwen3-8-flash/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Random Attention: Rethinking KV Cache Eviction for Efficient Reasoning</title><link>https://jaehun.me/en/posts/random-attention-rethinking-kv-cache-eviction-for-efficient-reasoning/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://jaehun.me/en/posts/random-attention-rethinking-kv-cache-eviction-for-efficient-reasoning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a&#10; href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03430v1"target="_blank"&#10; class="inline-flex items-center gap-1"&#10; &gt;Paper&lt;svg class="h-3 w-3 flex-shrink-0" id="external-link" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M15 3h6v6m-11 5L21 3m-3 10v6a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H5a2 2 0 0 1-2-2V8a2 2 0 0 1 2-2h6"/&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&#10; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="the-scores-were-a-waste-the-paradox-where-random-sampling-ties-the-strongest-in-kv-cache-eviction--an-in-depth-review-of-random-attention"&gt;The Scores Were a Waste: The Paradox Where &amp;lsquo;Random Sampling&amp;rsquo; Ties the Strongest in KV Cache Eviction — An In-Depth Review of Random Attention&lt;a href="#the-scores-were-a-waste-the-paradox-where-random-sampling-ties-the-strongest-in-kv-cache-eviction--an-in-depth-review-of-random-attention" class="heading-anchor" aria-label="Link to this section"&gt;&lt;svg class="h-4 w-4" aria-hidden="true" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24"&gt;&lt;g fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2"&gt;&lt;path d="M10 13a5 5 0 0 0 7.54.54l3-3a5 5 0 0 0-7.07-7.07l-1.72 1.71"/&gt;&lt;path d="M14 11a5 5 0 0 0-7.54-.54l-3 3a5 5 0 0 0 7.07 7.07l1.71-1.71"/&gt;&lt;/g&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10; &lt;blockquote&#10; class="border-primary bg-muted/30 hover:bg-muted/40 my-6 rounded-r-lg border-l-4 py-4 pr-4 pl-6 italic transition-all duration-200 ease-out hover:translate-x-1"&#10; &gt;&#10; &lt;div class="prose prose-sm max-w-none"&gt;&#10; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR&lt;/strong&gt; — Research on reasoning-specific KV cache eviction has always been the problem of &lt;strong&gt;scoring&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;ldquo;which tokens will matter later&amp;rdquo; and picking the top-K. Random Attention forcibly preserves only the prompt with +∞ and evicts the rest &lt;strong&gt;without any scores, uniformly at random per head&lt;/strong&gt;. Across 4 models and 6 reasoning tasks it matches the strongest baseline (TriAttention) in accuracy (statistical advantage in 31 of 60 comparison cells, significantly worse in just 1), and since vLLM serving has no scoring pass it delivers &lt;strong&gt;32–43% higher throughput&lt;/strong&gt; (source: §1, Fig. 1, Tab. 1, Tab. 4).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>